Soft ecologists responding to Curnicopians:

It is true, technology is necessary for development but the question is: To what extent does exploitation of resources justifies the destruction of nature?  Actually nothing justifies it, doesn’t matter if the country has a capitalists or communist ideology.  In both parts the country is destroying for benefit. You are comparing the Apple and the Samsung, but have you ever considered that that idea comes from a capitalist point of view? That the competition of resources and the competition of wealth is completely a capitalist thought? Imagine if we lived in a communist society, then there will not be competition, then we all would have apple and no Samsung interference, therefore, less contamination and less destruction of nature. What you guys are saying is that competition is good, and it helps us develop, but do you realize that competition involves destruction. How will you justify it when the world runs out of green spaces and there is no place to live? Will you still say that the competition was necessary? That is why, we as soft ecology think that you curnicopians are wrong, there is no wealth In capitalist societies and there is no benefit in competition. Communist societies contaminate way less, because of its ideology.